|
|
|
|
|
In
1996, at a meeting of the Commonwealth Press Union in South Africa,
WPFC Chairman Jim Ottaway and General Counsel Leonard Marks declared
war on insult laws, thus launching WPFC's ongoing campaign.
In the legislatures and the court of public opinion: When journalists and lawmakers
in the country determine that they are ready to take action toward
|
|
reform, WPFC will help mobilize
the international free-press community to make missions to
lawmakers needing encouragement, those resistant to change and those sitting
on the edge. Armed with opinions of international bodies such as the European
Court of Human Rights, the UN Human Rights Commission and the Organization of
American States, the group will show that now is the time to make the changes
needed to function as full partners in today's international community.
Abolish "insult laws" in
Africa
African Union's NEPAD African Peer Review
Mechanism: Campaign against 'insult laws' in Africa online
A campaign to rid African countries of "insult laws" - laws ostensibly
intended to protect the dignity and reputation of people in high office, but which
are actually used to protect presidents, parliamentarians and in varying degrees
other state officials from scrutiny of their conduct
in office - is to be launched in Lusaka, Zambia, on Monday during a workshop
which coincides
with World Press Freedom Day on May 3.
"Insult laws" are continually invoked against the media in Africa when
personal references to heads of state or officials are deemed insulting or when
journalists allege official or other misconduct such as corruption and maladministration.
Cases of editors and journalists being charged or imprisoned for such reports
abound. These laws apply in varying degrees of severity in 48 of the 53 countries
in Africa.
The Lusaka meeting is the first of a series of sub-regional advocacy workshops
on these laws in sub-Saharan Africa to create awareness of the legislation, broaden
knowledge about their application and effects and devise an action plan to campaign
for their removal from the statute books.
Next
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|