|
|
|
|
|
The African Media Barometer
The African Media Barometer is the first in-depth and comprehensive
description and measurement system for national media environments
on the African continent. It is motivated by a number of reasons:
|
• On 1 February 2005, several
media organisations, among them the Media Institute of Southern
Africa (MISA) and the International Press Institute (IPI),
expressed their concern over NEPAD's ongoing African Peer Review
Mechanism (APRM) to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, saying:
'The African Union has devised the African Peer Review Mechanism
(APRM)
on good governance, underscoring that the APRM is designed to
foster democracy in Africa. Yet, the APRM's good governance criteria
have a serious defect in that they omit a key requirement for
good
governance: the fostering of free and independent news media.'
Furthermore,
the Review Mechanism was developed and is carried out by government
agencies with no or not sufficient involvement of civil society
organisations and those who are affected by government policies.
The African Media Barometer is meant to overcome these defects
in regard to the media.
•
Media in Africa are the topic of numerous national or regional
studies mainly written by scholars for national or regional consumption.
There is no mechanism to achieve results that give an overview
over the state of the media that would enable readers to compare
developments in various countries.
• International freedom of the press surveys such as the one annually produced
by the New York-based Freedom House collect data from correspondents overseas,
international visitors, findings from human rights and press freedom organisations
and a variety of news media. The criteria are set and the data evaluated at headquarters.
The Friedrich Ebert Stiftung's Southern African Media Project and MISA took
the initiative to start the African Media Barometer in April 2005, a self assessment
exercise done by concerned and informed citizens in each particular country
according
to a number of general, homegrown criteria. The benchmarks used have to a large
extent been lifted from the African Commission for Human and Peoples' Rights
(ACHPR) 'Declaration of Principles on Freedom of Expression in Africa', adopted
in 2002, and attached to this report as appendix 1. (It was largely inspired
by the groundbreaking Windhoek Declaration on Promoting an Independent and
Pluralistic African Press [1991] and the African Charter on Broadcasting [2001].)
The ACHPR
is the authoritative organ of the African Union mandated to interpret the African
Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights which is binding for all member states.
42 indicators (see appendix) have been developed divided into four sectors:
1. Freedom of expression, including freedom of the media, are effectively protected
and promoted.
2. The media landscape is characterised by diversity, independence and sustainability.
3. Broadcasting regulation is transparent and independent, the state broadcaster
is transformed into a truly public broadcaster.
4. The media practice high level of professional standards.
Next
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
|